Which statement correctly describes the timing of a temporary injunction relative to a full court hearing?

Which statement correctly describes the timing of a temporary injunction relative to a full court hearing?

• A. A temporary injunction is issued pending the full hearing; a permanent injunction is issued after the court has heard all the evidence.
• B. A temporary injunction is issued after the court has heard all the evidence; a permanent injunction is issued pending a full hearing.
• C. A temporary injunction is a form of monetary damages; a permanent injunction is a form of monetary damages.
• D. A temporary injunction cannot be appealed; a permanent injunction can.

Answer: (A)

Temporary injunctions provide provisional relief to maintain the status quo and prevent irreparable harm while the case proceeds. The correct idea is that a temporary injunction is issued pending the full hearing, and if the evidence supports it, a permanent injunction is issued after the court has heard all the evidence. The other statements misstate the timing, confuse the remedy with monetary damages, or incorrectly claim that temporary relief cannot be appealed—where in many systems, injunction orders can be reviewed on appeal.

Temporary injunctions provide provisional relief to maintain the status quo and prevent irreparable harm while the case proceeds. The correct idea is that a temporary injunction is issued pending the full hearing, and if the evidence supports it, a permanent injunction is issued after the court has heard all the evidence. The other statements misstate the timing, confuse the remedy with monetary damages, or incorrectly claim that temporary relief cannot be appealed—where in many systems, injunction orders can be reviewed on appeal.