Which statement best describes irreparable harm?

Which statement best describes irreparable harm?

• A. Harm that can be remedied by money damages
• B. Harm that cannot be adequately remedied by money damages
• C. Harm that is only hypothetical
• D. Harm to personal property

Answer: (B)

Irreparable harm means injury that money cannot adequately compensate for or repair. That’s why this statement is the best: it captures the essence of why courts grant equitable relief—when the damage is of a kind that monetary damages wouldn’t fully fix, either because the harm is ongoing, irreversible, or substitutes cannot be found for the loss. If the injury could be fully remedied by money, it isn’t irreparable. If the harm were only hypothetical, there’d be no real risk to address. And while destruction or loss of personal property might be compensable with damages, that isn’t automatically irreparable unless the property is unique or non-replaceable.

Irreparable harm means injury that money cannot adequately compensate for or repair. That’s why this statement is the best: it captures the essence of why courts grant equitable relief—when the damage is of a kind that monetary damages wouldn’t fully fix, either because the harm is ongoing, irreversible, or substitutes cannot be found for the loss. If the injury could be fully remedied by money, it isn’t irreparable. If the harm were only hypothetical, there’d be no real risk to address. And while destruction or loss of personal property might be compensable with damages, that isn’t automatically irreparable unless the property is unique or non-replaceable.