What form of relief stops ongoing or future harm rather than compensating after the fact?

What form of relief stops ongoing or future harm rather than compensating after the fact?

• A. Injunctive relief
• B. Restitution
• C. Damages
• D. Arbitration

Answer: (A)

Injunctive relief is a form of equitable remedy that prevents harm before it occurs by ordering someone to stop or begin a particular action. It stops ongoing or future harm rather than compensating after the fact. For example, a court might issue a prohibition on a nuisance-causing activity or require a developer to halt construction that would encroach on another’s property. This type of relief can be temporary (to preserve the situation until a full case decision) or permanent after trial. This contrasts with damages, which are monetary payments intended to compensate for harm already suffered, and with restitution, which aims to restore the injured party to their prior position by returning property or benefits gained through wrongdoing. Arbitration is simply a dispute-resolution process, not a remedy that inherently prevents harm.

Injunctive relief is a form of equitable remedy that prevents harm before it occurs by ordering someone to stop or begin a particular action. It stops ongoing or future harm rather than compensating after the fact. For example, a court might issue a prohibition on a nuisance-causing activity or require a developer to halt construction that would encroach on another’s property. This type of relief can be temporary (to preserve the situation until a full case decision) or permanent after trial.

This contrasts with damages, which are monetary payments intended to compensate for harm already suffered, and with restitution, which aims to restore the injured party to their prior position by returning property or benefits gained through wrongdoing. Arbitration is simply a dispute-resolution process, not a remedy that inherently prevents harm.